ANOTHER CONTRADICTION
If the previous contradiction surprised you, then look at the following and you will be in no doubt that this cannot be Gospel. In Matthew 19:19, we read the following:
"Honour your father and mother and love your neighbour as yourself."
Now see Luke 14:26:
"If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sisters -yes, even his own life - he cannot be my disciple."
In Mark 10:19, we read the following:
"You know the commandments: "Do not murder, do not commit adultery, do not steal, do not give false testimony, do not defraud, honour your father and mother."
Now see Matthew 10:37:
"Anyone who loves his father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves his son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me."
Now see Mark 10:29:
"I tell you the truth," Jesus replied, "no one who has left home or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or fields for me and the gospel will fail to receive a hundred times as much in this present age (homes, brothers, sisters, mothers, children and fields and with them, persecutions) and in the age to come, eternal life."
As you have seen, these are some of the contradictions to be found in the Books of St Matthew, St Mark and St Luke.
ST MARK AND HIS STRANGE SPEECH
What is strange in St Mark's speech is that he claims Jesus (P) says in Chapter 12:31:
"...Love your neighbour as yourself."
In Chapter 10:30, he has mentioned the rewards a man receives for leaving his family:
"No one who has left home or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or fields for me and the gospel will fail to receive a hundred times as much in this present age (homes, brothers, sisters, mothers, children and fields and with them persecutions) and in the age to come, eternal life."
The basic contradiction aside, I suggest that the idea of having two mothers and fathers, let alone hundredfold, is unimaginable to the human mind unless the New Testament can see that it is biologically feasible to have more than one set of parents! The Lord is above making such statements!
JESUS SEES ALL THE PROPHETS AS THIEVES
In the Book of St John Chapter 10:7, Jesus (P) said:
"Therefore, Jesus said again, "I tell you the truth, I am the gate for the sheep. All whoever came before me were thieves and robbers, but the sheep did not listen to them."
IS THIS NOT A CLEAR DENIAL OF THE OLD TESTAMENT?
This is clearly opposite to Matthew 5:17, where Jesus (P) says:
"Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them."
How do Christians accept such talk; God's Prophets are thieves and robbers! And believe this to be GOSPEL?
IS THE MESSIAH GOOD OR NOT?
In Matthew 19:16, we read the following:
"Now a man came up to Jesus and asked, "Teacher, what good thing must I do to get eternal life?" "Why do you ash me about what is good?" Jesus replied. "There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, obey the commandments."
In Mark 10:17, we read this:
"As Jesus started on his way, a man ran up to him and fell on his knees before him, "Good teacher," he asked, "what must I do to inherit eternal life?" "Why do you call me good?" Jesus answered. "No one is good except God alone."
Also in Luke 18:18, we read:
"A certain ruler asked him; "Good teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?" "Why do you call me good?" Jesus answered. "No one is good except God alone."
Then in John 10:11, he contradicts all of the previous statements by saying:
"I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep."
There is no doubt that the simultaneous denial and approval of anything is clearly a contradiction. See Luke 6:45 for further contradiction:
"The good man brings good things out of the good stored up in his heart, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil stored up in his heart. For out of the overflow of his heart his mouth speaks."
This means that good can and does exist in many of the Messenger's followers as well as in the Messengers themselves. And as you see, it contradicts the previous speeches of the New Testament.
NEW TESTAMENT SAYS JESUS (P) DRINKS WINE
In Matthew 26:26, we read the following:
"While they were eating, Jesus took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to his disciples, saying, "Take and eat; this is my body. Then he took the cup, gave thanks and offered it to them, saying, "Drink from it, all of you. This is my blood of the new covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins. I tell you, I will not drink of this fruit of the vine from now on until that day when I drink it anew with you in my father's kingdom."
This is another example from the New Testament, of misleading today's believers, creating a bad image of God's Prophets, claiming they drink wine, which is forbidden in all the major religions. With regard to this subject, there are some features and issues that are unbelievable and I will clarify for the readers so that they see for themselves that this book is not Gospel from God, and to show them that its authors either wanted to attack the Holiness of God and the dignity of His Prophets, or they were in fact ignorant about religious ethics. Thus, they introduced into their writings things that cannot be believed to be God's Gospel. Here are some of the points:
(1) About the bread that Jesus (P) divided and gave to the disciples saying it was his body; this must be untrue. Even two wise persons could not agree on such a false issue. The reason being that he was sitting with them with his physical body. What Jesus (P) gave them was nothing but bread made from flour to eat and they ate it together. His complete body was there nothing has changed at all.
2. The wine in the cup, described as Jesus' blood is similarly quite untrue. His blood was flowing through his body. None was shed. In addition, Jesus (P) did tell them clearly that what was in the cup was in fact the fruit of the vine (wine).
3. His thankfulness for the drinking of wine - which is forbidden by God's Gospel - is not sensible. Such a thing is impossible for God's Prophet, thank God.
However, if we compare this to another Verse, it would appear that he in fact took the cup and became drunk. See Matthew 11:19:
"The Son of Man-tame eating and drinking, and they say, "Here is a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and "sinners." But wisdom is proved right by her actions."
The Holiness of the Lord's Prophet is far above accusations of drinking wine or committing such sins. Also, the true New Testament (Engeel), which was reveled by God to Jesus (P), is more Exalted than to be tainted by such worthless contradiction.
THE BOOKS WITH THE CHRISTIANS ARE NOT GOSPEL
If the Christians and Jews who have these books think about the contradictions and false information therein, they will realize that these books cannot be Gospel and cannot be said to come from God.
We know for sure that the Messiah's book is True and faultless. Christians themselves have complete evidence that Jesus (P) did not put the Bible together. The Books of the New Testament are proof that Jesus (P) himself did not put the books together, and are proof that those who did compile it were not perfect humans. They could make mistakes and could possibly lie. In addition, it may be of little significance to them if they construe the words or change them whether intentionally or unintentionally. These faults, however, are unable to discredit Jesus (P) or his true "Engeel."
WE DEMAND WITH THE PROOF OF THE AUTHENTICITY OF THIS BIBLE
We appeal to the Christians of today; we demand of you the following: first, bring us the scientific evidence proving that what Matthew, Mark, Luke and John have written is THE true GOSPEL.
Second, assuming that the first demand is met, though I say this merely to facilitate matters, how could Matthew, Mark, Luke and John collate this amount of information? Was it collected by Jesus (P) himself or under his command? If it was collected by Jesus (P) himself or under his supervision, then how is it that the books of the Bible contain an abundzs.nce of contradictions and obscenities aimed at God and his pure, clean Prophets, certainly not by Jesus' command!
Anyone making these allegations against Jesus (P) is stabbing him as well as his religion in the back.
All wise people know that any religious information intended for the general public ought to have been written either by Jesus (P) in person or by someone delegated by him to carry out the work under his supervision thus ensuring that the work be both free of error and to avoid corruption. Since none of the information was apparently collated in this way, it is time for you to wake up to the truth! This has been my aim - to awaken you from evil, to steer you away from these wicked ways and contradictions; God is above all of such!
THE UNITY OF THE BODIES OF MAN AND HIS WIFE In Matthew
19:3, we read the following:
"Some Pharisees came to him to test him. They asked, "Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any and every reason?" "Haven't you read," he replied, "that at the beginning the Creator made them male and female, and said, "For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh?" So they are no longer two, but one. Therefore what God has joined together, let man not separate."
Let the Christians with their wisdom look closely at this judgement. They will see that it totally opposes all physical laws. A man and his wife are two individuals. They cannot become one body. God gave them love and compassion, which may, or may not, later be eroded. This is how it has been since Creation. How would the argument be if there were two or even three wives and one man? Could they, too, be one?
ANOTHER CONTRADICTION
In Matthew 19:8, we read the following:
"Jesus replied, "Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning."
Here there are two points I would like to make. The first is that Jesus (P), by now forbidding divorce, is changing and opposing the law of previous Prophets. The second is that hard-heartedness is a poor excuse for divorce, but it does prove the point that the bodies of the husband and wife are two when they divorce. They are two people who through the sanctity of marriage may become physically one, which divorce would not allow.
We see around us today much hard-heartedness, wars, bloodshed, the killing of millions of people in poor nations to fulfill one's hunger for power. Also cruelty, while the New Testament screams,
"If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also." (Matthew 5:39) Look at the world today and you will see Christians fighting with evil. This is worth notice.
DIFFERENCE OF OPINION REGARDING
JESUS' ANCESTRY
St Matthew and St Luke have a difference of opinion regarding Jesus' ancestry according to their respective Books. In the Books of St Mark and St John, no mention is made of his ancestry.
(1) St Matthew, in 1:16, states that Joseph is the son of Jacob:
"And Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus (P), who is called Christ."
St Luke, in 3:23, states that Joseph is the son of Heli:
"Now Jesus himself was about thirty years old when he began his ministry. He was the son, so it was thought, of Joseph, the son of Heli,"
(2) St Matthew relates the ancestors of Jesus (P) back to Solomon, son of King David, in 1:6:
"And Jesse the father of King David. David was the father of Solomon, whose mother had been Uriah's wife."
St Luke, on the other hand, in 3:31, relates him to Nathan, son of David, brother of Solomon:
"...the son of Melea, the son of Menna, the son of Mattatha, the son of Nathan, the son of David."
(3) St Matthew names 26 fathers between Jesus (P) and Solomon's father, David. St Luke, on the other hand, names 42! Surely, this contradiction is enough evidence to prove that these Books cannot be Gospel!
CONTRADICTION ABOUT THE CRUCIFIXION
If we look at St Luke 23:46, we find:
"Jesus called out with a loud voice, "Father, into your hands I commit my spirit." When he had said this, he breathed his last."
Compare this to St Matthew's account in 27:46:
"About the ninth hour Jesus cried out in a loud voice, "Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?" meaning, "My God, my God, why you forsaken me?"
I have written out the verses for you, but please go back and look at the Bible.
JESUS (P) AND GODS
See St John 10:34, where Jesus (P) spoke to the Jews about 'gods' as plural, not one God:
"Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your Law, "I have said you are gods" If he called them 'gods,' to whom the word of God came (and the Scripture cannot be broken) what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world?"
Compare this to his prayer in 17:3, where he contradicts himself by saying:
"Now this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus, whom you have sent."
I wonder what Christians would say about this issue? Is it really wise, in terms of religion, for Jesus (P), God's Messenger, to mention other Gods, and then to contradict himself by saying there is only one God? How could this be Gospel?
CHRISTIANS ARE IN A BIND WITH NOWHERE TO GO
We are going to impress on the Christians in such a way that they cannot shun this matter. As we see it, they have two matters, which need to be confronted:
(1) We have shown that these Books, the Old and New Testaments of their Bible have clearly deviated from the Truth, and in their present form, cannot be considered to be Gospel, the Word of God; therefore, they must condemn them, renounce them.
(2) To acknowledge that Jesus (P), who brought these books full of blatant contradictions, is not the Messenger of God.
If you accept our first argument, that the Books are not Gospel, then your religion is clearly wrong. The Gospel from the Lord should not contain contradictions, false allegations and scandal. Their 'Gospel' clearly contains all of the aforementioned. My advice is that they should turn to the clean, pure, faultless religion of Islam, and hasten to become Muslims. Thus, they should believe in Muhammad (P), the Last Messenger of God.
We have shown that the Bible alleges that God's Prophets drink wine and commit unthinkable sins, causing God's angels to scream loudly and cry in shame. There is mention of the existence of other Gods.
To believe in the second point, that Jesus (P) who brought these books is not a Messenger would justify your relaxed attitude about the allegations made against him and the contradictions contained in the Books! May we ask Christians why they hold so fast to this Book? Are there no educated, knowledgeable people among you? Are you unable to distinguish right from wrong and acknowledge that this Book is not from God?
It is impossible for such a great person as Jesus (P) to be a liar! I summon every educated, open-minded Christian how you can believe in God and gods simultaneously, and how you can believe that Jesus (P) came, not to change the laws of previous Prophets, then did just that?
IS THE TESTIFICATION OF JESUS (P) AND GOD ACCEPTED IN THE NEW TESTAMENT
In John 8:17, we read the following:
"In your own Law it is written that the testimony of two men is valid. I am one who testifies for myself my other witness is the one who sent me - the Father."
If this statement was true and everyone could testify for himself using God as his witness, morals would be lost, crime would spread, oppression and robbery would become everyone's business. So, injustice would spread in society and people would have no security as regards their money, family or life. Show us how such a terrible law could be revealed from God and be Gospel!
THE TRINITY (THREE-IN-ONE) IS NOT TRUE
The Trinity was invented by some narrow-minded people whose ability to think was quite limited but the idea has become accepted through history. People who belong to the Dark Ages, mindless imitation, using no logic or wisdom or brain, have imitated it. If they would give it some thought, they would find themselves definitely wrong and their belief to be uncertain.
What is more astonishing is that this poison of Trinity flows in their veins and in their brains. Surprisingly, in this age of scientific technology, with today's knowledge and the era of traveling to the moon, spaceships, atoms and electronic brains, I do not know how they can accept it, especially when it was rejected by all Prophets among whom was God's Messenger, Jesus (P).
In John 17:3, we read the following:
"Now this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus, whom you have sent."
See also John 20:17:
"Jesus said, "Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet returned to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them: I am returning to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God."
From these statements, you see that Jesus (P) is equal to his brothers, God being their God and his God, no more, no less.
See also Matthew 10:40:
"He who receives you receives me, and he who receives me receives the one who sent me."
From this statement, you understand that Jesus (P) is God's Messenger. He is not united with God; no one is united with HIM. Also, it is impossible for the sender, and the one sent to be one. God and Jesus (P) are therefore two separate identities.
In Matthew 17:22, we read:
"When they came together in Galilee, he said to them, "The Son of Man is going to be betrayed into the hands of men. They will kill him, and on the third day he will be raised to life." And the disciples were filled with grief."
We summon you, our dear Christian friends, look with your wisdom's eye, ask, is it possible for the Son of Man to be Almighty God, with such traits as omniscience and eternal existence? Are we to suppose then that Jesus (P) was God, being hung on the cross to die?
In Mark 10:17, we read the following:
"As Jesus started on his way, a man ran up to him and fell on his knees before him. "Good teacher," he asked, "what must I do to inherit eternal life?" "Why do you call me good?" Jesus answered. "No one is good except God alone."
Do you not understand from this statement that Jesus (P) denies the word 'good' for anyone, even himself, but for God alone. He is therefore neither God nor united with God. In reality, if we are 'good,' it is due to God, and God, Who makes others good, is Himself good.
The reason therefore why Jesus (P) denied being good is to show that he is merely a Messenger.
